Why You Shouldn’t Rely on Google, ChatGPT, Forums or Social Media for Your U.S. Immigration Decisions
- visa code
- Oct 8
- 2 min read
In today’s digital world, answers to almost every question appear just a click away. From Google searches and AI platforms like ChatGPT and Perplexity to immigration-focused Facebook groups and forums, free advice is everywhere. But when it comes to U.S. immigration law, such reliance can come at a heavy cost.
Recently, a former contact who had first reached out in 2011 returned with the same concern exploring options to retain U.S. lawful permanent resident (LPR) status or return to the United States.
At the time, a formal consultation had been suggested, as the case required a careful legal evaluation of travel history, intent, and period of absence. It was informed during the prehire call that there appeared to be good prospects of retaining the LPR status if action was taken promptly and strategically.
However, instead of proceeding with a structured legal review, the individual chose to rely on online information and social media discussions, assuming that publicly available advice would be sufficient.
A Decade and a Half Later
After more than 14 years, the same question resurfaced whether it was still possible to preserve or reclaim permanent resident status. Unfortunately, by this point, the prospects of reinstating LPR status were extremely limited due to the significant lapse of time.
That said, a thorough review of the prior immigration record revealed something important: the individual had previously held H-1B status in the United States. This opened a narrow but realistic possibility eligibility to recapture the unused portion of H-1B validity.
With the right employer sponsorship, it may still be possible to re-enter the United States under valid H-1B status, even though new legislative changes may introduce an additional fee of USD 100,000 (which may or may not apply in this case).
It’s not an ideal situation, but it’s a reminder that even when one door closes, another may open if guided by the right legal expertise.
What This Case Teaches Us
Immigration law is fact-specific, timeline-sensitive, and constantly
evolving. Online platforms, forums, and AI tools can provide general guidance, but they cannot replace personalized legal advice from a qualified immigration attorney who understands the nuances of each case.
For a moment, let's assume this person had consulted with an experienced attorney in 2011, s/he would have retained the LPR status and would have been a U.S. Citizen for the past decade.
Common Risks of Following Online Advice:
Oversimplified answers that overlook your immigration history and timelines.
Outdated or incorrect interpretations of immigration laws and USCIS/DOS policies.
Missed filing opportunities or loss of eligibility due to reliance on non-verified information.
Irreversible consequences, especially in status preservation, overstays, or reentry cases.
Professional Guidance Makes a Difference
At The Visa Code, we regularly encounter individuals who lost critical time or opportunities because they acted on advice from unverified online sources. U.S. immigration law is intricate and unforgiving of mistakes but with timely and informed legal strategy, outcomes can be very different.
Our team is dedicated to helping clients make well-informed, legally sound decisions not based on online hearsay, but grounded in real experience and legal analysis.
The Bottom Line
If your U.S. immigration status, history, or future is at stake, seek professional advice. A consultation with an experienced immigration attorney can prevent years of regret and irreversible loss.
📱 WhatsApp: +91 824.858.3284