Success Story: 221(g) Issued for Social Media Vetting Despite Dropbox Eligibility
- visa code
- Jun 10
- 2 min read
Social Media Disclosure Now a Key Factor in U.S. Visa Processing
Our firm was recently contacted by a client who had received a 221(g) notice from a U.S. consular post in India. The client was applying for a visa renewal under the Interview Waiver (Dropbox) Program, which generally does not require an in-person interview. However, despite full eligibility, the applicant was asked to appear in person solely due to the disclosure of social media account identifiers.
This was not an isolated incident. Over the past few months, we have observed a noticeable increase in 221(g) notices and interview requests tied specifically to social media vetting, even in straightforward visa renewals.
What Is Happening?
Under the DS-160 form, applicants must disclose whether they have a social media presence, and if so, provide all usernames or identifiers used within the last five years.
Recent Trends We’ve Noticed:
Applicants who answered “No” to the social media question are receiving 221(g) notices asking for clarification or proof.
Applicants who answered “Yes” and listed all social media handles are also receiving 221(g) notices and are often required to attend a personal interview.
In some cases, the consular post is issuing 221(g)s purely based on the existence of private, inactive, or non-identifying accounts.
Discretionary Power of Consular Officers:
While the Interview Waiver Program is designed to streamline renewals, U.S. consular officers retain broad discretion to require personal appearances on a case-by-case basis. Social media has now become a prominent trigger for such discretion under the current administration’s expanded vetting policies.
As Attorney James Hollis aptly put it in his June 2025 Consular Update - "Damned if You Post, Damned if You Don’t":
“If you have a social media account with problematic content, you’re in trouble. If you have social media without problematic content, that’s suspicious. And if your accounts are private, that’s suspicious. Sounds like everyone is suspect.”
How We Helped:
In this client’s case, we helped prepare a comprehensive explanation of all social media disclosures, clarified the lack of any inappropriate content, and supported the client through the in-person interview process. Following our guidance and documentation, the visa was successfully approved.
Key Takeaways for Visa Applicants:
If you're applying for a U.S. visa or renewal under Dropbox, please keep in mind:
✅ Disclose all social media handles honestly, even if they are inactive or private.
✅ Ensure consistency between your online presence and your visa application.
✅ Avoid using misleading or anonymous identifiers unless well-explained.
✅ Be prepared for possible 221(g) follow-up or a request for an interview.
✅ Consult with an experienced immigration attorney before responding.
Conclusion:
As social media vetting intensifies, even low-risk applicants may face unexpected delays. If you’ve received a 221(g) or are unsure how to approach your social media disclosures, we’re here to assist you with proactive guidance and proven success strategies.
📩 Contact us today to schedule a consultation or learn more about how we can help.